Does Marijuana Change the Brain?
by Tia Ghose, Senior Writer | August 26, 2015 11:00am ET
The effects of marijuana on the brain may be more complicated than experts previously thought, and may depend on factors related to the person using the drug, such as their genetics, two new studies suggest.
Marijuana use does not lead to smaller brain size in teens, one of the new studies found. That finding contrasts with previous research suggesting the drug does have this effect.
But in people who are genetically prone to schizophrenia, marijuana could alter their brain development in potentially negative ways, according to the other new study.
Together, the two new studies point to a complicated and confusing picture of marijuana's effects on young brains. The studies suggest that a person's environment, culture and genes all play murky roles in the process.
Long-term effects
Dozens of studies have researched the differences between the brains of pot smokers and those of people who don't smoke marijuana. Overall, the research shows that heavy pot smokers — those who use pot at least three times a day — tend to have smaller gray-matter volumes in the orbitofrontal cortex , a brain region tied to addiction, but they also had greater connectivity between brain regions, according to a 2014 study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Other studies have shown that people who smoke pot in their teen years have lower IQs later on . And several studies have found that people whosmoke pot are more likely to develop schizophrenia than those who don't use the drug.
But the problem plaguing all of these studies is that people who smoke marijuana are different from those who don't in lots of ways, and untangling cause and effect can be incredibly tricky, the researchers said.
No obvious differences
To get a better picture of the effects of marijuana on the teenage brain, Arpana Agrawal, a geneticist at Washington University in St. Louis, and her colleagues looked at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the brains of 241 pairs of same-sex siblings, including some who were twins.
In some pairs, only one sibling had smoked marijuana; in others, both had smoked pot; and in some, neither sibling had used cannabis. By studying such pairs, who share half their DNA, the team hoped to untangle the effects of marijuana from those of other factors, such genetics or the environment of a person's home.
The team found that teens who had smoked pot — even once — did have smaller brain volume in the amygdala, a region associated with emotion processing and reward seeking, compared with those who had not smoked pot. The pot smokers also had smaller volume in the right ventral striatum, a brain region tied to reward processing.
However, the siblings who did not smoke pot but who shared similar genes and environment with their pot-smoking siblings also tended to have smaller volume in these key brain regions, compared with siblings who both avoided marijuana.
"That suggests there might be common factors, genetic and environmental, that predispose us to using marijuana that also contribute to variations in our brain volumes," Agrawal told Live Science.
High risk factors
In a second study, Dr. Tomáš Paus, a neuroscientist at the Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest in Toronto, and his colleagues used MRI to study the brains of more than 1,500 teenage boys. In one subgroup, the team looked at the teenagers' brains at two points in time: when the youngsters were almost 15 and almost 19 years old.
They found that over the four years, those who had smoked pot and also had several genes that increased their risk of schizophrenia had thinning in the cortex — the outer, gray matter of the brain — compared with those who had the same genes but had not smoked pot.
It's not clear what the thinning in this brain region means for what's going on inside the brain. It could be that the pot smokers had less-connected brain cell networks, fewer capillaries nourishing blood vessels in the cortex or fewer support cells, such as glial cells, Paus speculated.
However, the findings do hint that marijuana itself could be responsible for the thinning in the cortex, Paus said. The brain regions that showed the greatest cortical thinning also have high concentrations of cannabinoid receptors, which bind the active ingredients in marijuana, Paus said.
Schizophrenia is rare, and Paus noted that even among teens with the highest genetic risk of schizophrenia, only 4 percent actually develop the disease. About 1 percent of people in the general population have schizophrenia. In the study, the team didn't follow the teens long enough to see how many developed the disorder.
In addition, because schizophrenia is so rare, the study was too small to get a statistically meaningful answer to the question of whether smoking pot increased the teens' risk of the disorder, he added.
Still, the findings suggest that in susceptible people, smoking pot could alter brain development. "All we are saying is that if you combine cannabis use with the genetic risk, then the brain is maturing in a slightly different way," Paus told Live Science.
Jury still out
But scientists still aren't sure whether, and how, marijuana harms young brains.
"We really do not fully understand what impact marijuana use has on us, and I think, in particular, in youth," Agrawal said.
In an editorial accompanying the new studies in the journal, Dr. David Goldman, a neurogeneticist at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism in Rockville, Maryland, wrote that the effects of marijuana may vary among people.
"Because of diversity in genotype and environment, one person's sugar may be another's poison," Goldman wrote.
Still, that doesn't mean marijuana is safe for people with the "right" genes, Goldman added. Like other drugs, the effect of marijuana is dependent on the dose, and as high-concentration tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) weed becomes increasingly popular, the effect of the drug could change, he said.
Marijuana use does not lead to smaller brain size in teens, one of the new studies found. That finding contrasts with previous research suggesting the drug does have this effect.
But in people who are genetically prone to schizophrenia, marijuana could alter their brain development in potentially negative ways, according to the other new study.
Together, the two new studies point to a complicated and confusing picture of marijuana's effects on young brains. The studies suggest that a person's environment, culture and genes all play murky roles in the process.
Long-term effects
Dozens of studies have researched the differences between the brains of pot smokers and those of people who don't smoke marijuana. Overall, the research shows that heavy pot smokers — those who use pot at least three times a day — tend to have smaller gray-matter volumes in the orbitofrontal cortex , a brain region tied to addiction, but they also had greater connectivity between brain regions, according to a 2014 study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Other studies have shown that people who smoke pot in their teen years have lower IQs later on . And several studies have found that people whosmoke pot are more likely to develop schizophrenia than those who don't use the drug.
But the problem plaguing all of these studies is that people who smoke marijuana are different from those who don't in lots of ways, and untangling cause and effect can be incredibly tricky, the researchers said.
No obvious differences
To get a better picture of the effects of marijuana on the teenage brain, Arpana Agrawal, a geneticist at Washington University in St. Louis, and her colleagues looked at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the brains of 241 pairs of same-sex siblings, including some who were twins.
In some pairs, only one sibling had smoked marijuana; in others, both had smoked pot; and in some, neither sibling had used cannabis. By studying such pairs, who share half their DNA, the team hoped to untangle the effects of marijuana from those of other factors, such genetics or the environment of a person's home.
The team found that teens who had smoked pot — even once — did have smaller brain volume in the amygdala, a region associated with emotion processing and reward seeking, compared with those who had not smoked pot. The pot smokers also had smaller volume in the right ventral striatum, a brain region tied to reward processing.
However, the siblings who did not smoke pot but who shared similar genes and environment with their pot-smoking siblings also tended to have smaller volume in these key brain regions, compared with siblings who both avoided marijuana.
"That suggests there might be common factors, genetic and environmental, that predispose us to using marijuana that also contribute to variations in our brain volumes," Agrawal told Live Science.
High risk factors
In a second study, Dr. Tomáš Paus, a neuroscientist at the Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest in Toronto, and his colleagues used MRI to study the brains of more than 1,500 teenage boys. In one subgroup, the team looked at the teenagers' brains at two points in time: when the youngsters were almost 15 and almost 19 years old.
They found that over the four years, those who had smoked pot and also had several genes that increased their risk of schizophrenia had thinning in the cortex — the outer, gray matter of the brain — compared with those who had the same genes but had not smoked pot.
It's not clear what the thinning in this brain region means for what's going on inside the brain. It could be that the pot smokers had less-connected brain cell networks, fewer capillaries nourishing blood vessels in the cortex or fewer support cells, such as glial cells, Paus speculated.
However, the findings do hint that marijuana itself could be responsible for the thinning in the cortex, Paus said. The brain regions that showed the greatest cortical thinning also have high concentrations of cannabinoid receptors, which bind the active ingredients in marijuana, Paus said.
Schizophrenia is rare, and Paus noted that even among teens with the highest genetic risk of schizophrenia, only 4 percent actually develop the disease. About 1 percent of people in the general population have schizophrenia. In the study, the team didn't follow the teens long enough to see how many developed the disorder.
In addition, because schizophrenia is so rare, the study was too small to get a statistically meaningful answer to the question of whether smoking pot increased the teens' risk of the disorder, he added.
Still, the findings suggest that in susceptible people, smoking pot could alter brain development. "All we are saying is that if you combine cannabis use with the genetic risk, then the brain is maturing in a slightly different way," Paus told Live Science.
Jury still out
But scientists still aren't sure whether, and how, marijuana harms young brains.
"We really do not fully understand what impact marijuana use has on us, and I think, in particular, in youth," Agrawal said.
In an editorial accompanying the new studies in the journal, Dr. David Goldman, a neurogeneticist at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism in Rockville, Maryland, wrote that the effects of marijuana may vary among people.
"Because of diversity in genotype and environment, one person's sugar may be another's poison," Goldman wrote.
Still, that doesn't mean marijuana is safe for people with the "right" genes, Goldman added. Like other drugs, the effect of marijuana is dependent on the dose, and as high-concentration tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) weed becomes increasingly popular, the effect of the drug could change, he said.
In recent years, many studies have been conducted on cannabis because it is the illicit drug most used in the world, and it has been growing debate on legalization and control of use, so research their health risks it has become a subject of research.
ResponderEliminarMost of these studies investigated the effects of cannabis on the brain. The effects of cannabis on the brain are difficult to establish and depend on factors related to the person using the drug, such as genetics. However, in people with genetic predisposition, the use of this drug can be a trigger for a mental disorder.
What it is clear is that causes anatomical changes in the brain. These changes are related to psychosis, cognitive and behavioral disorders and reduced IQ.
In this article, written by Tia Ghose in Live Science, talks about studies on possible brain alterations that can produce cannabis in the brain taking into account the age of onset and the long-term effects.
In my opinion, this article is very interesting because some countries want to legalize cannabis use and this debate has become the main topic of study.
The cannabis use has always been in discussion amongst the scientific community. It is a natural drug that has been used for centuries. Even though it is known for some positive effects (and even used as a medicinal drug), it’s the negative effects on the brain that have been a question.
ResponderEliminarAs explained in this article, it is not easy to reach conclusions in how Marijuana changes the human brain. Tests and studies can only go so far, and the fact that the use of marijuana can´t be seen as an independent variable in the direct result of brain change, makes it harder to reach conclusions.
Although studies made on Rats, like most of the drugs, had strong results in how Marijuana changes the Hippocampus and the reward system, and therefore results in cognitive impairments, it´s not so easy to correlate with changes in the Human brain, even though the same kind of changes occurred, since the genetic population of these studies and the environment in which they were performed, have very little control compared to the same Study on Rats for example. There are indeed changes in the brain anatomy, IQ and even relations with other drugs abuse.
How far the consumption of Marijuana plays a part on this, and how much can it change from person to person, is a question that there is no answer for right now.
Personally I think that to smoke in their differing types, are prejudicial to the health, and people around the world must to leave this habit, because all types to smoke are harmful proportionally to the quantity that one consumes. Y, when appear the differents diseases that every habit causes, people run to the Hospital to demands a solution for a pathology that could have been prevented.
ResponderEliminarTo smoke marihuana deserves me the same opinion. There are differents studies which show the harmful effects that cause to the society that consumes it, and the differents pshiquiatrics problems that it can cause or contribute to them. Therefore, and even doubt the certainty of such studies, I think that the most intelligent is not smoke marihuana until anybody demonstrate the opposite, and the benefits (demonstrated) are greater than the harmful effects.
According with my classmates, there are a high controversy in this point, but I think that in a part, it is because society has not enough information about that and they do not know how far they can reach harmful effects on our brains, on the contrary, I think that they thinking about her twice before to smoke.
In the past, we didn't know the tobacco's harmful effects, and today, their are announced constantly. This has caused a descent to the consume, but this isn't enough yet. Then, Why not inform society about what smoking marijuana can cause in our brain?
I think people should know that is exposed if it continues with this habit. A lot of young people says that smoking marijuana is better than smoking tobacco, in my opinion, they defends this idea because they don't know the term side effects medium- and long, however, they knows (more or less) the tobacco's effects. I'm sure that if they knows that marijuana reduce the brain's size, or it can influences to have an schizophrenia, they will think twice before to prove marijuana.
It is right that there are others factors that influence to become a schizophrenic, and other illness, like genetics factors, sex or age, but these aren't modifiable, in the case of an harmful habit that is changeable and removable, why expose to him?
ResponderEliminarThis article presents a prevailing problem today in a lot of countries: should marijuana become legalized?
On the one hand, there are many defenders of positive effects of this drug because of its capacity to ease the pain
On the other hand, a lot of studies, without being conclusive, expose that marijuana may produce different changes of the volume of the brain; and also, it could be a trigger for some mental diseases although, like this article says, everything depends on both genetic and environmental factors.
In my opinion, it's a very interesting article because we are in front of a well-known drug actually and also a drug which is known since ancient times.
ResponderEliminarThe most interesting question I think this article shows is that we know very few things about this drug, being this one of the most popular drug of the world.
I think we have a long journey in front of us when we speak of this drug's effects and I think it's about time to get started.
We need to know everything possible about cannabis because every day more and more teenagers smoke pot without having enough knowledge about the matter.
Everyone talks about if we have to legalize marijuana but, I think, first we have to demonstrate the effects of this drug on the human beings, whether they really are dangerous or not; as these studies try to prove.
The legalization of marijuana is one of the most popular topics of debate in the current days. Should marijuana be legalized? Marijuana is one of the most used drugs, only surpassed by tobacco and alcohol. Among those illegal, it’s the most used.
ResponderEliminarAs stated in the article above, all studies hint that there is a relationship between marijuana long-term consumption and alterations in the brain (Which lead to schizophrenia for example), especially youth, since are more sensitive to the drug because their brain is already maturating. Marijuana contains psychotropic substances, which, by definition, have effects on the brain, so it’s not daring to suggest than some of those effects might be bad for the brain.
The chronic consumption of tobacco and alcohol causes worse health consequences than marijuana, and instead, they are legal. It’s not hypocritical then, to support marijuana illegality because of health reasons? It depends, since the consumption of alcohol or tobacco has an important cultural component and does not have a strong connection with the beginning of the consumption of more dangerous drugs such as heroin, and the marijuana consumption does.
Some people claim that legalization of Marijuana is a good strategy to reduce its consumption, they say that if you want to make disappear something you do not like, you do not have to ban it, since you make it worse. Legalization…that’s what Holland did, but things did not work out like that: Marijuana consumption has doubled since then and the country has become “the brain” of marijuana black market in Europe.
So, what we do with Marijuana? We must continue studying the effects of the marijuana until we find solid conclusions and if there are bad effects due to its consumption, decide whether or not the ban on the use of this substance should be maintained. Since we’re in the subject, let’s talk about what we do with tobacco and alcohol as well. Should we illegalize them, shouldn’t we? I do not think many people would agree with that. Why? Because freedom, “in the license era” we are living in, comes before everything else. Maybe, the reflection of all this is that freedom is important but so are responsibilities… you are free to harm yourself consuming illegal or legal drugs but you are not free to hurt others with your consumption (Passive smokers, dysfunctional family due to alcohol consumption, etc.) or to expect others to pay with their taxes the treatment your agonizing health needs, consequence of the FREE decisions you have made in the past.
I found this article really interesting, as it explains in a very understandable way the risks attributed to smoking marijuana, but what I liked the most is that it makes clear that we need further study before drawing definitive conclusions. We don't have appropiate knowledge of the human brain and how marijuana or other substances affect its development yet. I think that our priority should be to understand the brain development during chidhood and adolescence before trying to determine how drugs affect it. I am not denying the harmful effects of marijuana, because there is solid evidence that they exist, but I think that we would have a clearer idea of them if we knew the normal mechanisms that they alter.
ResponderEliminarI don't really have an opinion about if marijuana should be illegal or not. Most studies strongly suggest that it is harmful, so it should be illegal, but there are other harmful substances that are legal and widely consumed. And I think that keeping it illegl won't prevent people from trying or consuming it... marijuana is illegal in Spain, and still it is one of the most consumed drugs (right behind alcohol and tobacco).
According to my colleagues, regular use of marijuana and its effects are a very controversial issue without a clear conclusion. As Luis G. said, It is very difficult to differentiate the effects of this drug in the brain, as it can be influenced by other causes. What is certain is that it causes changes in different levels, regardless of the physiological impact on the structure of the brain. What should be assessed is its therapeutic use in certain cases, such as palliative care to relieve pain, and where the effects on the brain are not important because they are elderly, with a very low life expectancy.
ResponderEliminarMoreover, we cannot expose people to a drug that produces maladaptive behavioral changes, decreased IQ, and brain atrophy. So the legalization of marijuana is leaving totally defenseless people suffer a mental illness, such as psychosis or schizophrenia or minor neurological effects.
Marijuana contains tetrahydrocannabinol, a psychotropic substance that acts on the central nervous system and causes changes in different brain structures. Young people are the most vulnerable group because their brain is maturing, as Nuria G. said. Studies indicate that smoking marijuana before age 15 greatly increases the risk of cannabis psychosis, and 25- 50 % ends in a development of schizophrenia.
Personally, I think that being diagnosed with schizophrenia at 15 not only affects you, the individual, but it also affects the family and the environment. A 15 year-old individual goes from being a healthy person with a future ahead to become a chronic mentally ill person that depends on the medication and, even with medication, has a 40% chance of having a new psychotic outbreak. A person whose intellectual, cognitive, emotional skills, and level of motility will be impaired at high speed, shortening life expectancy and increasing the risk of suicide, additional use of other drugs, and general comorbidity. It will incapacitate the individual to have a life like the rest of the population, marking its future unfavorably. In addition, with each psychotic episode, the brain will atrophy more, and it will never return to baseline. Each new outbreak or decompensation will decrease the brain and brain structures will be disrupted.
As Esther G. said, alcohol and tobacco also have serious adverse effects, such as lung cancer, pharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer, oral cavity cancer, bladder cancer, ureter cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer, hepatic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis, and penile and testicular cancer. Although, these occur with a much more chronic consumption and with a much higher dose.
ResponderEliminarA one-time consumption of tobacco or alcohol will not produce adverse effects. For example, three identical subjects each consume a different drug in a one-time experiment. The first one drinks a beer, the second one smokes a joint of marijuana, and the third one smokes a cigar. Statistically speaking, and taking into account consumption and effects of different drugs, the cannabis user is more likely to suffer side effects. With this, I am not advocating the consumption of tobacco or alcohol, since the adverse effects of these drugs are also very serious.
If we talk about tobacco and alcohol, tobacco does not have any benefits in the body, while alcohol has been described to have certain benefits, for instance, a very moderate consumption of red wine significantly inhibits the synthesis of endothelin-1, a key vasoactive peptide in the development of atherosclerosis which contributes to the onset of ischemic heart disease.
I think that if a drug is legal or not, it depends on this very thing. If when using the same amount of each drug, cannabis is more likely to get you sick, it is logical that it has to be illegal. However, this does not mean that tobacco should be legal. Tobacco does not offer us any benefit either and, personally, I think it is a drug that should be illegal in the future. Since the only benefit described is in ulcerative colitis, but even then medicines are much better as a treatment, we can say that it is a totally useless substance and that hurts us.
Another issue is alcohol. Some alcoholic beverages have shown positive and beneficial effects on the human body and coronary heart disease. The problem comes when people abuse alcohol and when adverse effects occur. But this is like all other excesses; they are never good. For example, if food is abused, it eventually will develop heart, respiratory, endocrine – metabolic, and osseous problems. To prevent substance abuse or addiction, educating people adequately is a must, and especially young people, who are the most vulnerable and least informed about the the effects of substances. Information is power, so we must educate knowledge to use with different substances.
In conclusion, and making a summary of all contributions, the effects of cannabis should be studied in greater depth, and the advantages and disadvantages of its use should be further taken stock. Since it has been proven its analgesic power, it could be of great therapeutic benefit in elderly patients with short life expectancy or resistance to conventional analgesics.
This way, they will benefit from the analgesic effect without the side effects of this drug. Finally, I would like to thank my colleagues for their contributions to this controversial issue.